Sherlockian Theories

We are the Sherlockians. Now that we have recovered from the Fall, we won't stop until we have deduced the bejeesus out of the finale. Moffat, you won't win this time.
bakerstreetbabes:

holmesosis:

thenorwoodbuilder:

Ok, folks, it was very, VERY hard, but in the end I GOT IT! I know how Sherlock survived the fall!
Brace yourself, because this is a mind-blowing, SCIENTIFIC explanation.
We have to start by considering two indisputable laws of physics:
1) Murphy’s Law / Finagle’s corollary:‘If something can go wrong, it will’ therefore ‘If you throw a slice of buttered toast into the air it will always fall with the buttered side down.’
2) Cat’s conservation law:‘A Cat will always land on its foots.’
SO, what would happen if we stick a slice of toast with butter to a cat’s back and we throw it to the air? The cat, by law, will land on its feet, but the toast (by law too) will land on the butter’s side. Against this problem of physics laws, the nature chooses the best way of taking a solution: the cat may just not fall.

The cat with the toast, once it’s free in the air, will float at its cat-toast equilibrium point, where butter repulsion forces and cat forces are in balance. This point can be adjusted by removing some butter from the toast, adding it, or cutting some hairs (or legs) from the cat. In theory, this will cause the cat to remain stationary, however, in reality, due to varied nature of gravity and the non-uniform profile of Earth, the cat will simply spin around its center of gravity at ever-increasing speed.

So, all Sherlock had to do was to make and wear a harness specifically designed (and he IS a genius: how long could it have taken him to develop such a simple device?) to keep a cat on his front and a buttered toast (with the butter on top, of course) on his back: et voilà!
Then, at about 1 m from the ground, he had only to unfasten the harness and gracefully fall on the pavement, placing himself in the most convenient position.
I greatly encourage all London sherlockians to watch the sky in search of the spinning cat: as it should be still attached to the buttered toast, it should be also still flying around…
THIS will be CONCLUSIVE proof.
(For those interested in a more detailed explanation of the functioning of a cat-toast device, I recommend to visit this website)

Ladies and Gentlemen, science at work.

Reichenbach: conclusively solved.

bakerstreetbabes:

holmesosis:

thenorwoodbuilder:

Ok, folks, it was very, VERY hard, but in the end I GOT IT! I know how Sherlock survived the fall!

Brace yourself, because this is a mind-blowing, SCIENTIFIC explanation.

We have to start by considering two indisputable laws of physics:

1) Murphy’s Law / Finagle’s corollary:
‘If something can go wrong, it will’ therefore ‘If you throw a slice of buttered toast into the air it will always fall with the buttered side down.’

2) Cat’s conservation law:
‘A Cat will always land on its foots.’

SO, what would happen if we stick a slice of toast with butter to a cat’s back and we throw it to the air? The cat, by law, will land on its feet, but the toast (by law too) will land on the butter’s side. Against this problem of physics laws, the nature chooses the best way of taking a solution: the cat may just not fall.

image

The cat with the toast, once it’s free in the air, will float at its cat-toast equilibrium point, where butter repulsion forces and cat forces are in balance. This point can be adjusted by removing some butter from the toast, adding it, or cutting some hairs (or legs) from the cat. In theory, this will cause the cat to remain stationary, however, in reality, due to varied nature of gravity and the non-uniform profile of Earth, the cat will simply spin around its center of gravity at ever-increasing speed.

image

So, all Sherlock had to do was to make and wear a harness specifically designed (and he IS a genius: how long could it have taken him to develop such a simple device?) to keep a cat on his front and a buttered toast (with the butter on top, of course) on his back: et voilà!

Then, at about 1 m from the ground, he had only to unfasten the harness and gracefully fall on the pavement, placing himself in the most convenient position.

I greatly encourage all London sherlockians to watch the sky in search of the spinning cat: as it should be still attached to the buttered toast, it should be also still flying around…

THIS will be CONCLUSIVE proof.

(For those interested in a more detailed explanation of the functioning of a cat-toast device, I recommend to visit this website)

Ladies and Gentlemen, science at work.

Reichenbach: conclusively solved.

(via geothebio)

sherli-holmes:

lolly-tayy:

Ok so to bide my time before the next series of Sherlock comes out (and to keep me marginally sane), I’ve been reading all of the original Sir Arthur Conan Doyle stories, usually at work when I’m doing nothing else.
I was minding my own business until THIS happened:
Ok, the word WEDDING showed up. Pretty typical. Nothing to be super psyched about.
Wait…and now the word RAT is on the same page. Just a quick descriptor, again, nothing too exciting. But still, a neat coincidence…
…you’ve got to be kidding me. BOW. All three clue words for series 3 on one page? I quit. I’m done. I can’t do this anymore.

(page scan from the Barnes and Noble: The Complete Sherlock Holmes Volume 2. The story in question is called The Adventure of Charles Augustus Milverton)

CHARLES MILVERTON. The journalist who made a name by ruining people’s reputations. That makes so much sense in the context of Season 2.
If this is true, then basically, the three words mean nothing except for this story.
MOFFATISS YOU TROLLS.

sherli-holmes:

lolly-tayy:

Ok so to bide my time before the next series of Sherlock comes out (and to keep me marginally sane), I’ve been reading all of the original Sir Arthur Conan Doyle stories, usually at work when I’m doing nothing else.

I was minding my own business until THIS happened:

  • Ok, the word WEDDING showed up. Pretty typical. Nothing to be super psyched about.
  • Wait…and now the word RAT is on the same page. Just a quick descriptor, again, nothing too exciting. But still, a neat coincidence…
  • …you’ve got to be kidding me. BOW. All three clue words for series 3 on one page? I quit. I’m done. I can’t do this anymore.

(page scan from the Barnes and Noble: The Complete Sherlock Holmes Volume 2. The story in question is called The Adventure of Charles Augustus Milverton)

CHARLES MILVERTON. The journalist who made a name by ruining people’s reputations. That makes so much sense in the context of Season 2.

If this is true, then basically, the three words mean nothing except for this story.

MOFFATISS YOU TROLLS.

(via not-foyles-division)

Pretty Things & Monsters: Reichenbach Explanation – Richard Brook was real – Rumpelstiltskin

eva-christine:

The crackpot IOU theory left a lot of questions unanswered: Who is Richard Brook? Why is Sherlock’s behavior so out of character throughout the entire episode? Since when is Mycroft so stupid? What is the final problem? Why does Moriarty thank Sherlock before killing himself? There has to be…

This theory is probably one of the most thought through I’ve seen in ages.Brilliant read and utterly convincing.

Anonymous asked: Has anyone thought of tea as a clue? In the opening scenes of Bank of England/Pentonville Prision/Tower of London, tea is spilt. They have given clues in early scenes before. Plus we have tea served to Moriarty. I cant find any other ideas on this one, so wondering if you had any? Also the lone cab ride that Sherlock takes, is that the unusual thing he does that Moffat references? He is always in a cab with John. Others had these ideas?

Not that I’ve noticed, anon! 

I have a feeling a while ago that I read a short stub about the tea: it being a staple of British existence, by its being spilt within multiple important institutions, it signified the crumbling of the Government’s (Mycroft’s?) control. Perhaps the link to Moriarty there is that he now holds the keys to the Kingdom.

I might be way off base though. If anyone else has thoughts, please let me know in the ask box! 

Summary of Theories for The Three Words

watsonfangirl190:

Rat

  • Rattigan
  • Giant Rat of Sumatra- Either creating a story for the throw-away line OR actually doing the story it comes from (Vampire of Sussex)
  • Metaphorical rat- Moran? Spy?
  • We’re still working on a way to make this relate to Empty House because HOW CAN THE FIRST ONE NOT BE EMPTY HOUSE??
Wedding
  • Obvious thought is Watson’s wedding to Mary Morstan, which means Sign Of Four, though it’s been pointed out that Blind Banker has MANY elements of SIGN and Moftiss does not have a habit of repeating themselves. So hmmm.
  • Other stories that involve weddings: Solitary Cyclist, Noble Bachelor, Charles Augustus Milverton, 
  • We also find it interesting that Scandal in Bohemia actually involves a wedding. Return of Irene? huh….
Bow
  • UGH ok. TOO MANY OPTIONS
  • bow like hair bow? bow tie? etc?
  • bow like take a bow? Last Bow. Which is a collection title, not a story. So interesting there. Contains Dying Detective, though, one of my favs.
  • Bow like violin bow? That’s a bit vague though as Holmes plays is violin in MANY stories.
  • Ship’s bow? The Dutch ship, Friesland? Throw-away line in Norwood Builder. 
  • found a funny theory that it means Sherlock’s on a ship fulfilling his Pirate dreams.
Overarching Theories
  • Replace character of Van Bork (Last Bow) with Moran and/or remnant of Moriarty’s empire to combine Empty House and Last Bow.  (Contact snaitf if you’d like her to expound on this.)
  • First episode follows Sherlock, second follows John, and third is Empty House where they come back together. (GAH OMG PLEASE NO)

(Source: hislyra)

Remember, the first episode of Series 3 is already confirmed to be based on The Adventure of the Empty House

finalproblem:

Gatiss said so back in May. (Besides, this is the only logical time to do that story if they’re ever going to.)

So speculate all you like on RAT, WEDDING, and BOW. But if you don’t find a way to involve Empty House in your Series 3 fantasy league, you’re ignoring the one thing that’s actually been confirmed.

So glad that finalproblem addressed this, because it seemed to be forgotten in all the hype. Empty House Woooh!

Mycroft was Moriarty’s target

thecutteralicia:

Since it appears to be unofficial Mycroft meta week on my dash, I wanted to pop in and give my theory on a question that has been going around fandom, on and off, since Reichenbach: Why was Mycroft not one of the people on Moriarty’s hit list? 

Read More

fridafrag:

worlds-only-consulting-fandom:

ravenclawgirl29:

OH MY GOD

OH MY GOD

OH MY GOD!!!!!

JAWN IS GOING TO MARRY MOLLY

JAWN IS GOING TO MARRY MOLLY!!!

HOLY WOW THIS IS A NEW ONE. Although she does apparently have the last name Hooper, could she still be Mary? Is it too tenuous a link? Thoughts?

‘Oh, and grab some milk while you’re out. John hates it when I forget…’

(Source: finalproblem)